Diagnosing recipient- vs. donor-derived posttransplant myelodysplastic neoplasm via targeted single-cell mutational profiling
Authors
- J. Ihlow
- L. Penter
- L.G. Vuong
- P. Bischoff
- B. Obermayer
- A. Trinks
- O. Blau
- A. Behnke
- T. Conrad
- M. Morkel
- C.J. Wu
- J. Westermann
- L. Bullinger
- A.C. von Brünneck
- N. Blüthgen
- D. Horst
- S.D. Praktiknjo
Journal
- Med
Citation
- Med
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Distinguishing donor- vs. recipient-derived myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is challenging and has direct therapeutical implications. METHODS: Here, we took a translational approach that we used in addition to conventional diagnostic techniques to resolve the origin of MDS in a 38-year-old patient with acquired aplastic anemia and evolving MDS after first allo-HSCT. Specifically, we used single-cell transcriptional profiling to differentiate between donor- and recipient-derived bone marrow cells and established a strategy that additionally allows identification of cells carrying the MDS-associated U2AF1(S34Y) variant. RESULTS: The patient exhibited mixed donor chimerism combined with severely reduced erythropoiesis and dysplastic morphology within the granulocytic and megakaryocytic lineage along with the MDS-associated U2AF1(S34Y) mutation in the bone marrow. Single-cell transcriptional profiling together with targeted enrichment of the U2AF1(S34Y)-specific locus further revealed that, while the immune compartment was mainly populated by donor-derived cells, myelopoiesis was predominantly driven by the recipient. Additionally, concordant with recipient-derived MDS, we found that U2AF1(S34Y)-mutated cells were exclusively recipient derived with X but not Y chromosome-specific gene expression. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the clinical potential of integrating high-resolution single-cell techniques to resolve complex cases for personalized treatment decisions.